The UNUSED License of the Redeemed |
by David A. DePra |
And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as |
some affirm that we say), "Let us do evil, that good may |
come?" Whose damnation is just. (Rom. 3:8) |
Doing evil "that good might come" is, of course, nothing more |
than a excuse for sin. It is, in fact, license. But let's ask: Why |
would anyone accuse Paul of teaching that sin is OK -- because |
sin amplifies the righteousness of God? |
Let's probe into this: If Paul were teaching strict adherance to |
the law of God, how could anyone interpret that as license? They |
couldn't. If Paul were telling us that the OT law is binding, and that |
we must keep it if we are to be a Christian, then his words could |
never be construed to mean that sin is acceptable. But if he |
taught that we were freed from keeping the law, well then that's |
another story. If He taught that we are both saved and accepted |
by God totally by His grace -- regardless of works -- THEN he |
might be accused of teaching license by those who did not |
understand him. |
Do you see this? Only a gospel of grace -- one which |
teaches that God forgives us and save us regardless of works -- |
can be misinterpreted as license. Only if Paul taught a gospel |
which accented faith rather than works could his words be twisted. |
The accusation against Paul shows us as much about what he |
taught as does his teaching itself. No one teaching law-keeping |
is ever accused of license. But teach the gospel of grace and you |
will be accused of license. |
Paul was not the only one who was ever accused of teaching |
license. Jesus was likewise accused of this error. The Pharisees |
said that He taught that they did not have to keep the law of |
Moses. But if you read the Sermon on the Mount, you find that |
Jesus made the law MORE binding, not less. He took what the |
Jews were keeping outwardly and made it binding on the inward. |
Of course, Jesus did this to fulfill the law's main purpose: To |
expose us all as helpless sinners. No one can keep the law. God |
gave it to show us we need to be saved by His grace alone. |
Ok. But does the fact that we stand before God by grace alone |
mean we can freely sin? This IS the issue. The answer is simple: |
Anyone who truly receives the grace of God -- I mean, REALLY |
receives it -- is not going to WANT to freely sin. The "wanting to |
sin" which was in them through Adam has already been dealt with. |
Thus, any so-called "license" which grace provides will never be |
used by one who is saved by the grace of God in Jesus Christ. |